Twelve reasons — not new but often forgotten — for scientists to participate in science communication activities

Twelve reasons — not new but often forgotten — for scientists to participate in science communication activities

Main Article Content

Ronnie Reyes-Arriagada
Carla Christie
Paul Bamford

Abstract

Scientific communication through outreach and engagement activities is currently recognized as an important element of  researcher’s work, however, participation by scientists in this type of  activities remains low. Many scientists do not understand the purpose and benefits that outreach provides for the public at large, which may further account for a low percentage of  time devoted to scientific communication. The growing societal role of  science communication becomes paradoxical in light of  the limited motivation by scientists to participate in these activities. Therefore, the objective of  this article is to provide a brief, limited and systematic summary of  12 arguments that justify why scientists should be communicating their work to society. These arguments may be useful for scientific and technological institutions in developed countries, and especially in developing countries, where the social bond to science and technology is more limited.

References

Annessi-Passena Eugenio, Carmela Barbera, Cecilia Langella, Francesca Manes-Rossi, Alessandro Sancino, Mariafrancesca Sicilia, and Ileana Steccolini. 2020. “Reconsidering public budgeting after the COVID-19 outbreak: key lessons and future challenges.” Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management 32 (5): 957-65. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-07-2020-0115.

Basset, Mary T. 2020. “Tired of science being ignored? Get political.” Nature 586 (7829): 337. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-02854-9.

Bauer, Martin W., and Pablo Jensen. 2011. “The mobilization of scientists for public engagement.” Public Understanding of Science 20 (1): 3-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662510394457.

Besley, John C., Anthony Dudo, and Martin Storksdieck. 2015. “Scientists' views about communication training.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 52 (2): 199-220. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21186.

Boudry, Maarten, Fabio Paglieri, and Massimo Pigliucci. 2015. “The fake, the flimsy, and the fallacious: Demarcating arguments in real life.” Argumentation 29 (4): 431-56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-015-9359-1.

Bowater, Laura and Kay Yeoman. 2013. Science Communication: a practical guide for scientists. Jhon Wiley & Sons. https://www.wiley.com/legacy/wileychi/bowater/

Burcher, Kevin. 2015. Factors affecting public engagement by researchers: literature review. Policy Studies Institute, London. https://wellcome.org/sites/default/files/wtp060036.pdf.

de Bruin, Wändi Bruine, and Ann Bostrom. 2013. “Assessing what to address in science communication.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110 (S3): 14062-68. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212729110.

Chocobar, CN. 2020. Mora, F. Neuroeducación. Solo se puede aprender lo que se ama. Educatio Siglo XXI, 38(2): 263-268. https://revistas.um.es/educatio/article/view/434181.

Franzolin, Fernanda, Paulo S. García, and Nelio Bizzo. 2020. “Amazon conservation and students’ interests for biodiversity: The need to boost science education in Brazil.” Science Advances 6 (35): eabb0110. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abb0110.

Friedman, David P. 2008. “Public Outreach: A Scientific Imperative.” The Journal of Neuroscience 28 (46): 11743-45. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0005-08.2008.

Harrison, T.G., K.L. Hanford, B.T. Cheesman, G. Kaur, S.D. Franklin, A.M.C. Laurain, M.I. Medley, A.C. Rivett, K.L. Shallcross, K.E. Shaw, S.J. Williams, and D.E. Shallcross. 2011. “The many positive impacts of participating in outreach activities on postgraduate students.” New Directions 7: 13-17. https://doi.org/10.29311/ndtps.v0i7.461.

Hesselink, Fritz, Wendy Goldstein, Peter Paul van Kempen, Tommy Garnett, and Jinie Dela. 2007. Communication, education, and public awareness (CEPA): A toolkit for national focal points and NBSAP coordinators. Convention on Biological Diversity & IUCN Commission on Education and Communication. 308 pp. https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/9260.

Krasny, Marianne E. 2005. “University K–12 science outreach programs: How can we reach a broad audience?.” BioScience 55 (4): 350-59. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0350:UKSOPH]2.0.CO;2.

Kreps, S.E, and D.L. Kriner. 2020. “Model uncertainty, political contestation, and public trust in science: Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic”. Science Advances 6 (43): eabd4563. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abd4563.

Leshner, Alan I. 2007. “Outreach training needed.” Science 315 (5809): 161. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1138712.

McNeill, Katherine L., and Amanda M. Knight. 2013. “Teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of scientific argumentation: The impact of professional development on K–12 teachers.” Science Education 97 (6): 936-72. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21081.

Peters, Hans Peter. 2013. “Gap between science and media revisited: Scientists as public communicators.” Proceedings of the natural Academy of Sciences 110 (S3): 14102-109. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212745110.

Richmond, Jonathan E. D. 2007. “Bringing critical thinking to the education of developing country professionals.” International Education Journal 8 (1): 1-29. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ841627.

Royal Society. 2006. Factors Affecting Science Communication: a Survey of Scientists and Engineers. 46 pp. The Royal Society, London. https://royalsociety.org/topics-policy/publications/2006/science-communication/.

Singh, Gerald G., Jordan Tam, Thomas D. Sisk, Sarah C. Klain, Megan M. Mach, Rebecca G. Martone, and Kai M.A. Chan. 2014. “A more social science: barriers and incentives for scientists engaging in policy.” Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 12: 161-66. https://doi.org/10.1890/130011.

Tintori, Antonio and Rosella Palomba. 2017. Turn on the light on science: A research-based guide to break down popular stereotypes about science and scientists. Ubiquity Press. 120 pp. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv3t5r1s.

Von Winterfeldt, Detlof. 2013. “Bridging the gap between science and decision making.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110 (S3): 14055-61. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1213532110.

Webb, Alexis B., Christopher R. Fetsch, Elisa Israel, Christine M. Roman, Cindy H. Encarnación, Jeffrey M. Zacks, Kurt A. Thoroughman, and Erik D. Herzog. 2012. “Training scientists in a science center improves science communication to the public.” Advances in Physiology Education 36 (1): 72-76. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00088.2010.

You, Jongeun. 2020. “Lessons from South Korea’s Covid-19 policy response”. American Review of Public Administration 50 (6-7): 801-808. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074020943708.