When Artificial Intelligence Formulates Laws: Are We Redefining the Scientific Method?

When Artificial Intelligence Formulates Laws: Are We Redefining the Scientific Method?

Main Article Content

Ivan Suazo Galdames

Abstract

The emergence of the AI-Newton model, capable of autonomously formulating physical laws from experimental data without prior knowledge, marks a paradigm shift in the philosophy and practice of science. Unlike conventional AI systems focused on pattern recognition, AI-Newton constructs theoretical frameworks and derives universal principles, such as energy conservation, mimicking and even surpassing human scientific heuristics. This development challenges the anthropocentric conception of science as a uniquely human endeavor, raising fundamental epistemological questions. Are we witnessing an extension or a radical transformation of the scientific method? As AI begins to automate concept formation and theoretical innovation, the role of human comprehension and meaning-making in science is brought into question. Rather than opposing this shift, the scientific community must confront the philosophical implications of a future where machines not only support but potentially outpace human discovery.

References

Burdon, P. (2015). Hannah arendt: on judgment and responsibility. Griffith Law Review, 24(2), 221-243. https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2015.1058215

Kidd, I. (2010). Pluralism and the 'Problem of Reality' in the Later Philosophy of Paul Feyerabend.

Fang, Y.-L., Jian, D.-S., Li, X. & Ma, Y.-Q. (2025). AI-Newton: A Concept-Driven Physical Law Discovery System without Prior Physical Knowledge https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.01538