Applicability of the Moyers method for the estimation of the mesiodistal diameter of canines and premolars in patients of 12-18 years old

Applicability of the Moyers method for the estimation of the mesiodistal diameter of canines and premolars in patients of 12-18 years old

Main Article Content

Oscar Ameneiros Narciandi
Laura Pereda Vázquez
Amanda Alvarez Hernández

Abstract

One of the most universal methods used to predict the mesiodistal width of non-erupted canines and premolars is the one designed by Dr. Edison Moyers, an American orthodontist who, taking the Anglo-Saxon population as a reference, created percentile tables to estimate these values ​​in the maxilla and mandible. During the last decade, several researchers have discovered that, when applied to various populations, there are significant differences between predictions and actual values. In Cuba, it is widely used at a 50% probability for prediction in both sexes, but there are few reports of studies that validate its reliability and those that do exist use small samples of patients. For this reason, the objective of this research is to determine the applicability of the Moyers method at 50% probabilities for estimating the mesiodistal diameter of canines and premolars in patients 12-18 years of age. A descriptive and cross-sectional study was developed from July 2019 to February 2020 with a population of 125 patients, 62 females and 63 males, between 12 and 18 years old from Cuba. Measurements were made of the mesiodistal widths of the lower incisors, all the canines and premolars. Frequency distributions were made to the variables studied and the results were presented in statistical tables. To verify the existence of significant differences, the statistical t-Student test was used. The main results obtained were that the Moyers method tends to underestimate the values ​​for the female sex between 0.4-0.5 mm, and for the male sex between 0.6 and 0.7 mm, this difference being significant for men. It is concluded that the Moyers method cannot be applied in the population studied for the prediction of the mesiodistal width of canines and premolars

References

Ameneiros, O., Ferreiro, A., Llanes, M., Batista, N., & Fernández, E. (2015). Validez predictiva del método de Moyers en estudiantes de la Facultad de Estomatología. En: Congreso Internacional de Estomatología 2015. Palacio de las Convenciones, La Habana, Cuba. 2-6 noviembre de 2015, http://www.estomatologia2015.sld.cu/index.php/estomatologia/nov2015

Bhatnagar, A., Kumar Jindal, M., & Yunus Khan, S. (2019). Comparison of Two Different Non-Radiographic Mixed Dentition. Pesqui. Bras. Odontopediatria Clín. Integr., 19(4374):1-9, http://doi.org/10.4034/PBOCI.2019.191.59

Bishara, S., Jakobsen, J., Abdallah, E., & Fernández, A. (1989). Comparisons of mesiodistal and buccolingual cronw dimensions of the permanent teeth in three populations from Egypt, Mexico, and United States. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop., 96(5):416-22, http://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(89)90326-0

Cañas, G., Carreno, S., Araya, P., & Díaz, P. (2018). Evaluación de la exactitud de métodos de Tanaka-Johnston y Moyers en pacientes chilenos del Postgrado de Ortodoncia UNAB Santiago, Chile. Odontología Vital., 28(34): 51-56, https://revistas.ulatina.ac.cr/index.php/odontologiavital/article/view/162

De Armas, Y., Alemán, M., Martínez, I. & Almeida, R. (2014). Diámetro mesiodistal de incisivos y caninos superiores e inferiores. Índices incisivos. Matanzas, 2012. Rev Méd Electrón., 36(4): 438-48, http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1684-18242014000400006&lng=es

de Llano-Pérula, M., Ricse, E., Fieuws, S., Willems, G., & Orellana-Valvekens, M. (2020). Malocclusion, Dental Caries and Oral Health-Related Quality of Life: A Comparison between Adolescent School Children in Urban and Rural Regions in Peru. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health., 17(2038): 1-11, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32204433/

Ferreiro, A., Marín, G., Massón, R., & Lazo, Y. (2020). Evaluación del Método Moyers-Jenkins en estudiantes con oclusión normal. 2013-2015. Facultad de Estomatología. En: Congreso Internacional de Estomatologìa 2020 (Virtual).Cuba. 1-30 de noviembre de 2020, http://www.estomatologia2020.sld.cu/index.php/estomatologia/2020/paper/viewPaper/282

Giri, J., Pokharel, P., Gyawali, R., Timsina, J., & Pokhrel, K. (2018). New regression equations for mixed dentition space analysis in Nepalese mongoloids. BMC Oral Health., 18(214): 1-7, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-018-0677-1

Guimarães, S., Jorge, K., Fontes, M., Ramos-Jorge, M., Araújo, C., Ferreira, E. & et al. (2018). Impact of malocclusion on oral. Braz. Oral Res., 32(95): 1-9, http://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0095

Handayani, F., & Hidayah, R. (2019). Applicability of Moyers and Tanaka-Johnston analyses for the Arab population of Pekalongan, Indonesia. Dent. J. (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi), 52(3): 154-158, http://dx.doi.org/10.20473/j.djmkg.v52.i3.p154-158

Mansano, J., Silva, J., Donato, C., & Martão, F. (2018). Epidemiological pattern of malocclusion in Brazilian preschoolers. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva., 23(11): 3861-3868, http://doi.org/10.1590/1413-812320182311.24722016

Moyers, R. (1992). Manual de Ortodoncia. 4ta ed. Chicago, Editorial Panamericana.

Murrieta-Pruneda, L., Cruz-Muñoz, A., & Orozco-Cuanalo, L. (2020). Frecuencia de Maloclusión Dental en Escolares y su Relación con la Edad, el Sexo y la Escuela de Procedencia. European Scientific Journal., 16(3): 37-47, http://dx.doi.org/10.19044/esj.2020.v16n3p37

Pintér, Z., Rill, L., Vitályos, G., Borbásné, K., Kolarovszki, B., & Frank, D. (2019). Applicability of the Moyers mixed dentition analysis for the Hungarian population. Orv Hetil., 160(50): 1984–1989, http://doi.org/10.1556/650.2019.31571

Proffit, W., Fields, H., Larson, B., & Sarver, D. (2019). Ortodoncia Contemporánea. 6ta ed. Barcelona, Elsevier.

Puri, R., Nelwan, S., & Saskianti, T. (2020). Space Analysis by Moyers Method, Tanaka Johnston Method and Sitepu Method in Mixed Dentition. European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine., 7(7): 778-782, https://ejmcm.com/article_2936.html

Ravinthar, K., & Gurunathan, D. (2020). Applicability of Different Mixed Dentition Analyses among Children Aged 11–13 Years in Chennai Population. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent., 13(2): 163–166, http://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1736

Shetty, R. D., Reddy, H., S., S., Lakade, L., Shetty, S., Vannala, V., & Reddy, M. (2019). A Newly Proposed Regression Equation for Mixed Dentition Analysis Using the Sum of the Width of Permanent Mandibular Central Incisors and Permanent Mandibular First Molars as a Predictor of Width of Unerupted Canine and Premolars. Pesqui. Bras. Odontopediatria Clín. Integr., 19(4643): 1-7, http://doi.org/10.4034/PBOCI.2019.191.58

Suryawanshi, G., Mahindra, R., Mohode, R., Pathak, A., & Bafna, H. (2017). Applicability of Moyer's mixed dentition analysis in Maharashtrian children of India. Indian Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Research., 3(3): 163-167, https://www.ijodr.com/article-details/4947

Thakur, H., & Jonathan, P. (2017). Applicability of Moyer’s and Tanaka-Johnston mixed dentition analysis in school childen of Sri Ganganagar Distric (Rajasthan) – A Pilot Study. IDA Ludhiana’s Journal., 1(3): 17-23, http://le-dentistry.com/uploadfiles/led2017_033_dr._himani.20171114074325.PDF