Soft tissue changes after anterior maxillary osteotomy by using 3D CBCT scanning.

Barra lateral del artículo

PDF (English)
Publicado: dic 1, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.32457/ijmss.2017.030

Detalles del artículo

Cómo citar
AL-Omar, A., & AL-Dakroroy, U. (2017). Soft tissue changes after anterior maxillary osteotomy by using 3D CBCT scanning. International Journal of Medical and Surgical Sciences, 4(4), 1245–1250. https://doi.org/10.32457/ijmss.2017.030
Número
Vol. 4 Núm. 4 (2017): December 2017
Sección
Artículo Original

La publicación es gratuita y sus contenidos se distribuyen con la licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) . Los derechos de las obras publicadas en esta revista son propiedad del autor y este es libre de distribuir y difundir las mismas fuentes siempre y cuando cite correctamente la fuente de publicación, estos actos no sean con fines comerciales y no se generen obras derivadas.

Soft tissue changes after anterior maxillary osteotomy by using 3D CBCT scanning.

Contenido principal del artículo

Ahmed AL-Omar
Department Of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery King Khalid University Hospital, Dental University Hospital Faculty of Dentistry, King Saud University
Usama AL-Dakroroy
Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Must University.

Resumen

The objective of this study was to evaluate the soft tissue changes after anterior maxillary osteotomy using cone beam computed tomography. The study included twelve patients diagnosed as suffering from an excess of the anterior part of maxilla and required surgical correction by anterior maxillary osteotomy. Assessment of Cone beam computed tomography in evaluation the soft tissue changes. All cases subjected to anterior maxillary osteotomy using modified Cuper technique. Follow up of cases was does clinically and radio- graphically by cone beam computed tomography. The results of the study proved that the statistically significant increase in mean Nasolabial angle after 6 months was 5.2 degrees, the mean value of nasal width after 6 months was 0,9mm. The mean value of Philtrum length was 3.3mm. In conclusion, Cone Beam Computed Tomography can be used to obtain dimensionally accurate linear and angular measurement from bony maxillofacial structure and landmarks and allows accurate, three-dimensional imaging of hard and soft tissues.

Citas

Akpek, S., Brunner, T., Benndorf, G., & Strother, C. Three-dimensional imaging and cone beam volume CT in C-arm angiography with flat panel detector.Diagn. Inter. Radiol., 11(1):10-3, 2005.

Baba, R., Ueda, K., & Okabe, M. Using a flat panel detector in high resolution cone beam CT for dental imaging. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., 33(5):285-90,2004.

Bell, W.H., & Dann, J.J. Correction of dentofacial deformities by surgery in anterior part of the jaws. A study of stability and soft tissue changes. Am. J. Orthod.,64(2):162-187, 1973.

Boeddinghaus, R., & Whyte, A. Current concepts in maxillofacial imaging. Eur. J. Radiol.,66(3):396-418, 2008.

Cupar, I. Die Chirurgische behandling der form und stellingsveran derungen des oberkiefers. Ost. Z. Stomatol., 51:565, 1954.

Finlay, P.M., Atkinson, J.M., & Moos, K.F. Orthognathic surgery: Patient’s expectations psychological pro¬file and satisfaction with outcome. Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., 33(1):9-14, 1995.

Fonseca, R., Dexter, H., Powers, M., & Frost, D. Oral and maxillofacial trauma. 4 Ed. USA:Elsevier, 2012.

Flygare, L., & Ohman, A. Preoperative imaging procedures for lower wisdom teeth removal. Clin. Oral Investig., 12(4):291-302, 2008.

Ganz, S. D. Computer-aided design computeraided manufacturing applications using CT and cone beam CT scanning technology. Dent. Clin. North Am., 52(4):777-808, 2008.

Kiyak, H.A., Vitaliano, P.P., & Crinean, J. Patient’s expectations as predictors of orthognathic surgery outcomes. Health Psychol.,7(3):251-68,1988.

Mohanc, A. M. Maxillary osteotomy in management of occlusal deformities. J. Oral Surg., 24(4):305-17, 1966.

Nadkaraini, P.G. Soft Tissue Profile Change Associated with orthognathic surgery for bimaxillary protrusion. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., 44(11):851-4,1986.

Ouellette, P. L. Psychological ramifications of facial change in relation to orthodontic treatment and orthognathic surgery. J. Oral Surg., 36(10):787- 90, 1978.

Panula, K., Finne, K., & Oikarinen, K. Incidence of complications and problems related to orthognathic surgery: a review of 655 patients. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., 59(10):1128-36, 2001.

Park, J. U., & Hwang, Y. S. Evaluation of the soft and hard tissue changes after anterior segmental osteotomy on the maxilla and mandible. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., 66(1):98-103, 2008.

Sukovic, P. Cone beam computed tomography in craniofacial imaging. Orthod. Craniofac. Res.,6(1):31- 6, 2003.

Polton, D. R. Surgical orthodontics, maxillary procedures. Angle. Orthod., 46(4):312-31, 1986.

White, S.C., & Pharoah, M.J. Oral Radiology Principles and Interpretation. 6 ed. St Louis Missouri: Elsevier, 2008.

Wilmot, J.J., Barber, H.D., Chou, I.G., & Vig, K. V. Associations between severity of dentofacial deformity and motivation for orthodonticorthognathic surgery treatment. Angle Orthod., 63(4):283-8, 1993.

Wunderer, S. Die prognathie operation mittels frontal gestieltem maxillfragment. Ost. Z. Stomatol., 59:98, 1962.