Impacto del nuevo sistema de educación pública sobre el rendimiento académico de estudiantes y escuelas en Chile
Barra lateral del artículo
Detalles del artículo
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
The published works are free to distribute and disseminate in the same sources provided that they correctly cite the source of publication and these acts have no commercial purpose. The publication is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC- 4.0) license.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Los trabajos publicados son libres de distribuir y difundir en las mismas fuentes siempre que cite correctamente la fuente de publicación y estos actos no tengan fines comerciales. La publicación se distribuye bajo la licencia Creative Commons CC Reconocimiento 4.0 (CC BY-NC- 4.0).
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
En el 2017 cambió la administración de las escuelas y liceos públicos desde los municipios hacia el Gobierno Central mediante la Ley 21.040 que crea los Servicios Locales de Educación Pública (SLEP). En la actualidad no hay un estudio que mida el impacto de esta política pública sobre el rendimiento de escuelas y estudiantes. De esa manera, en este trabajo se intenta medir el impacto utilizando datos de la Agencia de la Calidad de la Educación y con metodologías de propensity score matching y diferencias en diferencias (DiD). En general se encuentra un impacto negativo en el rendimiento de escuelas y estudiantes producto del cambio en la administración, sin embargo, en algunos casos se encuentra un impacto positivo.
Citas
Agencia Nacional de la Calidad de la Educación. (s. f.). Base de datos SIMCE. Recuperado el 27 noviembre 2024 de https://informacionestadistica.agenciaeducacion.cl/#/bases.
Agencia Nacional de la Calidad de la Educación. (2020). SIMCE. https://www.agenciaeducacion.cl/simce/.
Ahlin, Å., & Mörk, E. (2008). Effects of decentralization on school resources. Economics of Education Review, 27(3): 276-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2007.01.002.
Akai, N.; Sakata, M. & Tanaka, R. (2007). Financial Decentralization and Educational Performance: Evidence from State-level Panel Data for the United States. Institute of Business and Economic Research, Conference paper no. C07-11. Berkeley: University of California.
Akpan, E. (2011). Fiscal Decentralization and Social Outcomes in Nigeria. European Journal of Business and Management, 3(4): 167-183.
Alderman, H., Orazem, P. F., & Paterno, E. M. (2001). School quality, school cost, and the public/private school choices of low-income households in Pakistan. The Journal of Human Resources, 36(2): 304-326. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069661.
Barankay, I., & Lockwood, B. (2007). Decentralization and the productive efficiency of government: Evidence from Swiss cantons. Journal of Public Economics, 91(5-6): 1197-1218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2006.11.006.
Bardhan, P., & Mookherjee, D. (2005). Decentralizing antipoverty program delivery in developing countries. Journal of Public Economics, 89(4): 675-704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2003.01
Behrman, J. R., Deolalikar, A. B., & Soon, L.-Y. (2003). The role of decentralization in promoting effective schooling in developing Asia. Asian Development Review, 20(1): 57-99. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0116110503000034.
Biblioteca del Congreso Nacional (2017). Ley 21.040 – Crea el Sistema de Educación Pública. Ministerio de Educación.
Bohlmark, A. & Lindahl, M. (2008). Does School Privatization Improve Educational Achievement? Evidence from Sweden’s Voucher Reform. Serie de documentos de trabajo de IZA núm. 3691, IZA, Bonn.
Busemeyer, M. R. (2008). The impact of fiscal decentralisation on education and other types of spending. Swiss Political Science Review, 14(3): 451-481. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1662-6370.2008.tb00109.x.
Caliendo, M. & Kopeinig, S. (2005). Some Practical Guidance for the Implementation of Propensity Score Matching. Discussion Paper Series, IZA DP 1588.
Chumacero, R. A., Gallegos Mardones, J., & Paredes, R. D. (2016). Competition pressures and academic performance in Chile. Estudios de Economía, 43(2): 217-232. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-52862016000200003.
Chumacero, R. A., Gómez, D., & Paredes, R. D. (2011). I would walk 500 miles (If it paid): Vouchers and school choice in Chile. Economics of Education Review, 30(5): 1103-1114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2011.05.015.
Chumacero, R. A., & Paredes, R. D. (2012). Vouchers, choice, and public policy: An overview. Estudios de Economía, 39(2): 115-122. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-52862012000200001.
Diaz-Serrano, L., & Meix-Llop, E. (2012). Do fiscal and political decentralization raise students’ performance? A cross-country analysis. IZA Discussion Paper 6722. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2114902.
Elacqua, G. (2012). The impact of school choice and public policy on segregation: Evidence from Chile. International Journal of Educational Development, 32(3): 444-453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2011.08.003.
Elacqua, G. & Fabrega, R. (2007). El consumidor de la educación: el actor olvidado de la libre elección de escuelas en Chile. En Cueto, S. (ed.), Uso e impacto de la información educativa en América Latina.Santiago de Chile: Preal.
Faguet, J.-P., & Sánchez, F. (2007). Decentralization’s effects on educational outcomes in Bolivia and Colombia. World Development, 36(7): 1294-1316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.06.021.
Falch, T., & Fischer, J. A. V. (2012). Public sector decentralization and school performance: International evidence. Economics Letters, 114(3): 276-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2011.10.019.
Falleti, T. G. (2005). A sequential theory of decentralization: Latin american cases in comparative perspective. American Political Science Review, 99(3): 327-346. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055405051695.
Galiani, S., & Schargrodsky, E. (2002). Evaluating the impact of school decentralization on educational quality. Economía, 2(2): 275-314. https://doi.org/10.1353/eco.2002.0004.
Gallego, F.; Cortés, C.; Lagos, F. & Stekel, Y. (2008). El rol de la información en la educación: cartillas de información sobre indicadores de resultados educativos de establecimientos educacionales subvencionados a padres y apoderados. En Irarrázaval, I.; Puga, E. & Letelier, M. (eds.), Camino al Bicentenario: propuestas para Chile. Santiago de Chile: Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile.
Gallego, F. & Hernando, A. (2009). School Choice in Chile: Looking at the Demand Side. Documento de trabajo núm. 356 de la Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. Santiago de Chile.
Gertler, P., & Glewwe, P. (1989). The willingness to pay for education in developing countries: Evidence from rural Peru. World Bank.
Gibbons, S., Machin, S., & Silva, O. (2008). Choice, competition, and pupil achievement. Journal of the European Economic Association, 6(4): 912-947. https://doi.org/10.1162/JEEA.2008.6.4.912.
Gómez, D., Chumacero, R. A., & Paredes, R. D. (2012). School choice and information. Estudios de Economía, 39(2): 143-157. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-52862012000200003.
Hanushek, E. A., Kain, J. F., Rivkin, S. G., & Branch, G. F. (2007). Charter school quality and parental decision making with school choice. Journal of Public Economics, 91(5-6): 823-848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2006.09.014.
Hanushek, E. A., Link, S., & Woessmann, L. (2013). Does school autonomy make sense everywhere? Panel estimates from PISA. Journal of Development Economics, 104, 212–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2012.08.002
Hastings, J; Kane, T. & Staiger, D. (2006). Parental Preferences and School Competition: Evidence from a Public-School Choice Program.
Working Paper 12995, NBER.
Hoxby, C. M. (2000). Does competition among public school’s benefit students and taxpayers? American Economic Review, 90(5): 1209-1238. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.90.5.1209.
Humplick, F. & Moini-Araghi, A. (1996). Is There an Optimal Structure for Decentralized Provision of Roads? Policy Research Working Paper 1657, Policy Research Department, The World Bank.
Imberman, S. A. (2011). The effect of charter schools on achievement and behavior of publicschool students. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7-8): 850-863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.02.003.
Jaramillo, M. C. (2010). La descentralización: Una mirada desde las políticas públicas y las relaciones intergubernamentales en Baja California. Región y sociedad, 22(49). https://doi.org/10.22198/rys.2010.49.a426.
King, E. & Ozler, B. (2000). What’s decentralization Got To Do with Learning? The Case of Nicaragua’s Education Reform. Development Research Group. Impact of Education Reforms.
Kristiansen, S. & Pratikno. (2006). Decentralizing education in Indonesia. International Journal of Educational Development, 26(5): 513-531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2005.12.003.
Ladd, H. & Fiske, E. (2001). Does Competition Generate Better Schools? Evidence from New Zealand. Serie de documentos de trabajo de Terry Sanford Institute of Public Policy núm. SAN01- 16, Terry Sanford Institute of Public Policy, Duke University, Carolina del Norte.
Letelier, L. (2010). Descentralización Fiscal y Eficiencia Técnica del Sector Público: Los Casos de la Educación y la Salud. Documentos y Aportes en Administración Pública y Gestion Estatal, 14: 7-24. https://doi.org/10.14409/da.v1i14.1252.
Letelier, L. (2020). Teoría y práctica de la descentralización fiscal. Santiago: Ediciones UC.
Letelier, L., & Ormeño, H. (2018). Education and fiscal decentralization. The case of municipal education in Chile. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 36(8): 1499-1521. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654418761888.
Lindaman, K., & Thurmaier, K. (2002). Beyond efficiency and economy: An examination of basic needs and fiscal decentralization. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 50(4): 915-934. https://doi.org/10.1086/342760.
Luo, W. & Chen, S. (2010). Fiscal decentralization and public education provision in China. Canadian Social Science 6(4): 28-41.
McEwan, P. & Carnoy, M. (1988). Competition and Sorting in Chile’s Voucher System. Mimeografiado. California: Stanford University.
Melo, L. A. (2012). The results in the provision of public education under different decentralized contexts: The colombian case. The Journal of Developing Areas, 46(2): 85-103. https://doi.org/10.1353/jda.2012.0042.
Millimet, D. L., & Collier, T. (2008). Efficiency in public schools: Does competition matter? Journal of Econometrics, 145(1-2): 134-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2008.05.001.
Montecinos, E. (2022). Santiago no es Chile – Propuestas para un Estado regional descentralizado. Santiago: Paidós.
Muttaqin, T; van Dujin, M.; Heyse, L. & Wittek, R. (2016). The impact of decentralization on educational attainment in Indonesia. In: Holzhacker, R.; Wittek, R. & Woltjer, J. (Eds), Decentralization and Governance in Indonesia. Volume 2 of the series Development and
Governance (pp. 79-103). Switzerland: Springer
Oates, W. (1972). Fiscal Federalism. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. New York.
Oates, W. (1985). Searching for Leviathan: An Empirical Study. American Economic Review, 75(4): 748-757.
Rose-Ackerman, S. (1980). Risk taking and reelection: Does federalism promote innovation? The Journal of Legal Studies, 9(3): 593-616. https://doi.org/10.1086/467654.
Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1): 41-55. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/70.1.41.
Salinas, P. & Solé-Ollé, A. (2009). Evaluating the Effects of Decentralization on Educational Outcomes in Spain. IEB Work Document 10. Barcelona: Barcelona Business Institute.
Samuelson, P. A. (1954). The pure theory of public expenditure. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 36(4): 387-389. https://doi.org/10.2307/1925895.
Sandström, F. M., & Bergström, F. (2005). School vouchers in practice: Competition will not hurt you. Journal of Public Economics, 89(2-3): 351-380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.03.004.
Simatupang, R. (2009). Evaluation of Decentralization Outcomes in Indonesia: Analysis of Health and Education Sectors. Economics Dissertation, Georgia State University, 58.
Smith, B. C. (1985). Decentralization: The territorial dimension of the state. London: Allen & Unwin.
Subsecretaría de Desarrollo Regional y Administrativo. (s. f.). Sistema Nacional de Información Municipal. Recuperado el 27 noviembre 2024 de https://datos.sinim.gov.cl/datos_municipales.php.
Toi, A. (2010). An empirical study of the effects of decentralization in Indonesian junior secondary education. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 9(2): 107-125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-010-9081-6.
Fernández Ruiz, J. (1997). La descentralización administrativa. En Derecho administrativo (pp. 35-56). Disponible en https://archivos.juridicas.unam.mx/www/bjv/libros/4/1920/6.pdf.
Wang, W., Zheng, X., & Zhao, Z. (2011). Fiscal reform and public education spending: A quasinatural experiment of fiscal decentralization in China. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 42(2): 334-356. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius.