Subnational atomization as a factor of increasing corruption in Venezuela

Barra lateral del artículo

PDF
Publicado: jul 29, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.32457/riem.vi17.327
Palabras clave:
Corrupción, Venezuela, Descentralización, Subnacional, Atomización

Detalles del artículo

Cómo citar
Lecuna, A. (2018). Subnational atomization as a factor of increasing corruption in Venezuela. Revista Iberoamericana De Estudios Municipales, (17), 5–27. https://doi.org/10.32457/riem.vi17.327
Número
Núm. 17 (2018): enero-julio
Sección
Artículos de Investigación

Los trabajos publicados son libres de distribuir y difundir en las mismas fuentes siempre que cite correctamente la fuente de publicación y estos actos no tengan fines comerciales. La publicación se distribuye bajo la licencia Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC- 4.0).

Subnational atomization as a factor of increasing corruption in Venezuela

Contenido principal del artículo

Antonio Lecuna
Universidad del Desarrollo Entrepreneurship Institute

Resumen

This mixed-method research is based on the general proposition that the greater the number of subnational jurisdictions relative to the population and the greater the number of vertical tiers of government, the greater the incentives for corruption. The specific focus is on the atomization of subnational governments and the creation of community councils as two factors of flawed political decentralization that are linked to increased corruption in Venezuela. The propositions are tested using fieldwork analysis on three subnational units of governance in Venezuela and multivariate statistical tests against a wide range of controls on 100 randomly selected countries.

Citas

Ades, A, & Di Tella, R. (1997). National champions and corruption: some unpleasant interventionist arithmetic. The Economic Journal, 107(443), 1023-1042.

Ades, A., & Di Tella, R. (1996). The causes and consequences of corruption. IDS Bu-lletin, 27(2), 6 -10.

Albalate del Sola, D. (2013). The institutional, economic and social determinants of local government transparency. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 16(1), 90 -107.

Andersson, K., & van Laerhoven, F. (2007). From local strongman to facilitator: Institutional incentives for participatory Municipal governance in Latin America. Comparative Political Studies, 40(9), 1085 -1111.

Arshed, N., Carter, S., & Mason, C. (2014). The ineffectiveness of entrepreneurship policy: Is policy formulation to blame? Small Business Economics, 43(3), 639–659.

Arze, F.J., & Martínez-Vázquez, J. (2004). Decentralización en América Latina desde una perspectiva de países pequeños: Bolivia, El Salvador, Ecuador y Nicaragua. Gestión y Política Pública, 13(3), 619- 661.

Avellaneda, C. N., & Gomes, R. C. (2015). Is small beautiful? Testing the direct and nonli-near effects of size on municipal performance. Public Administration Review, 75(1), 137-149.

Bardhan, P. (2005). Scarcity, Conflicts, and Cooperation: Essays in Political and Institutional Economics of Development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Bardhan, P., & Mookherjee, D. (2006). Accountability and decentralization of infrastructure delivery in developing countries. Economic Journal, 116(1), 101-127.

Beeri, I., & Navot, D. (2013). Local political corruption: Potential structural malfunctions at the central–local, local–local and intra-local levels. Public Management Review,15(5), 712-739.

Besley, T., & Burgess, R. (2002). The political economy of government responsiveness: Theory and evidence from India. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(4), 1415 -1451.

Boyne, G. A. (2006). Strategies for public service turnaround lessons from the private sector?. Administration & Society, 38(3), 365-388.

Brennan, G., & Buchanan, J. (1980). The Power to Tax. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Brunetti, A., & Weder, B. (2003). A free press is bad news for corruption. Journal of Public Economics, 87(7-8), 1801-1824.

Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Bloomberg, L. (2014). Public value governance: Moving beyond traditional public administration and the New Public Management. Public Administration Review, 74(4), 445-456.

Burki, S., Perry, G., & Dillinger, W. (1999). Beyond the Center: Decentralizing the State. Washington, DC: World Bank Press.

Caiden, G., & Sundaram, P. (2004). The specificity of public service reform. Public Administration and Development, 24(5), 373-383.

Canovan, M. (1999). Trust the people! Populism and the two faces of democracy. Political Studies, 47(1), 2-16.

de Graaf, G., & Huberts, L. W. (2008). Portraying the nature of corruption using an explorative case study design. Public Administration Review, 68(4), 640-653.

de Mello, L., & Barenstein, M. (2001). Fiscal decentralization and governance: A cross-country analysis. IMF working paper no. 01-171.

Ellner, Steve, “Hugo Chávez’s first decade in office: Breakthroughs and shortcomings.” Latin American Perspectives 37.1 (2010): 77-96.

Ellner, Steve, “Venezuela’s social-based democratic model: innovations and limitations.” Journal of Latin American Studies 43.3 (2011): 421-449.

Enikolopova, R., & Zhuravskaya, E. (2007). Decentralization and political institutions. Journal of Public Economics, 91(11-12), 2261-2290.

Fan, S., Lin, C., & Treisman, D. (2009). Political decentralization and corruption: Evidence from around the world. Journal of Public Economics, 93(1-2), 14-34.

Fisman, R., & Gatti, R. (2002a). Decentralization and corruption: Evidence across countries. Journal of Public Economics, 83(3), 325-345.

Fisman, R., & Gatti, R. (2002b). Decentralization and corruption: Evidence from U.S. Federal transfer programs. Public Choice, 113(1-2), 25-35.

Fitzpatrick, J., Goggin, M., Heikkila, T., Klingner, D., Machado, J., & Martell, C. (2011). A new look at comparative public administration: Trends in research and an agenda for the future public administration review, Public Administration Review, 71(6), 821-830.

Gupta, S., Davoodi, H., & Alonso-Terme, R. (1998). Does corruption affect income inequality and poverty. IMF working paper no. 98-76.

Holden, S.H., Norris, D.F., & Fletcher, P.D. (2003). Electronic government at the local level: Progress to date and future issues. Public Performance & Management Review, 26(4), 325 -344.

Holland, P.W. (1986). Statistics and causal inference. Journal of the American statistical Association, 81(396), 945-960.

Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons?. Public administration, 69(1), 3-19.Huther, J., & Shah, A. (1998). Applying a simple measure of good governance to the debate on fiscal decentralization. World Bank Policy Research working paper no. 1894.

Inman, R.P., & Rubinfeld, D.L. (1996). Designing tax policy in federalist economies: an overview. Journal of Public Economics, 60(3), 307-334.

Jonsson, L. (2008). Ideas on organizing Municipalities. Public Management Review, 10(4), 539-558.

Lin, J.Y., & Nugent, J.B. (1995). Institutions and Economic Development, in Handbook of Economic Development, vol. 3A, ed. J. Behrman and T. N. Srinivasan. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland.

Lecuna, A. (2012). Corruption and size decentralization. Journal of Applied Economics, 15(1), 139-168.

Lecuna, A. (2013). From Chavismo to a democratic left in Venezuela. Dissent, 60(3), 26-28.

Mauro, P. (1995). Corruption and growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3), 681-712.

McCourt, W. (2008). Public management in developing countries: From downsizing to governance. Public Management Review, 10(4), 467- 479.

Morales Quiroga, M. (2009). Corrupción y democracia: América Latina en perspectiva comparada. Gestión y Política Pública, 18(2), 205-252.

Nguyen, T.V., Bach, T.N., Le, T.Q., & Le, C.Q. (2017). Local governance, corruption, and public service quality: Evidence from a national survey in Vietnam, International Journal of Public Sector Management, 30(2), 137-153.

North, D.C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Oates, W. (1972). Federal Fiscalism. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace and Javonovich.

Panizza, F. (2005). Unarmed utopia revisited: The resurgence of left of centre politics in Latin America.” Political Studies, 53(4), 716-734.

Petras, J. (2007). Venezuela: Between ballots and bullets, Global Research, November, 1-14.

Prud’homme, R. (1995). The dangers of decentralization. The World Bank Observer,10(2), 201-219.

Sanoja, P. (2009). Ideology, institutions and ideas: Explaining political change in Venezuela. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 28(3), 394-410.

Saravia, E., & Gomes, R.C. (2008). Public Management in South America: What ha-ppened in the last ten years?. Public Management Review, 10(4), 493-504.

Seawright, J. (2012). Dismantling Democracy in Venezuela: The Chávez Authoritarian Experiment. By Allan Brewer-Carías. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 25(1), 151-164.

Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1993). Corruption. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 599-617.

Sylvia, Ronald D., and Constantine P. Danopoulos. “The Chávez phenomenon: Political change in Venezuela.” Third World Quarterly 24.1 (2003): 63-76.

Tanzi, V. (1998). Corruption around the world: Causes, consequences, scope, and cures. IMF working paper no. 45-4.

Tiebout, C. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. The Journal of Political Economy, 64(5), 416 - 424.

Treisman, D. (2000). The causes of corruption: a cross-national study. Journal of Public Economics, 76(3), 399-457.

Treisman, D. (2002). Decentralization and the quality of government. UCLA working paper.

Webb, E., Cambell, D., Schwartz, R., & Sechrest, L. (1966). Unobtrusive Measures: Non-reactive Research in the Social Sciences. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.

Wood, T. (2009) Latin America tamed. New Left Review 58, 135 -148.