PERCEPCIÓN DEL ÉXITO SOBRE GOBIERNO ABIERTO EN FUNCIÓN DEL GÉNERO: UN ANÁLISIS DESDE SOCIEDAD CIVIL ORGANIZADA Y GOBIERNO
Main Article Content
Abstract
Gobierno Abierto (GA) es un modelo novedoso que configura una estrategia de gestión pública basada en transparencia, participación, rendición de cuentas y datos abiertos, que está siendo cada vez más asumida por los gobiernos de diferentes niveles, pero también por la Sociedad Civil Organizada (SCO). Sin embargo, las percepciones sobre el término de GA varían entre actores gubernamentales y de SCO, pero ¿las percepciones también varían por el género? Esta investigación presenta resultados de un cuestionario aplicado a SCO y a funcionarios públicos involucrados en las acciones de GA en el Estado de Jalisco, México, particularmente se analizan estadísticamente las percepciones de éxito en función del género. El objetivo de la investigación es contrastar las valoraciones en cuatro dimensiones analíticas asociadas al éxito: a) gobierno abierto, b) transparencia, c) participación ciudadana y d) datos abiertos. Los hallazgos muestran una brecha considerable entre las percepciones de los funcionarios públicos y la SCO, así como la relación del éxito del gobierno abierto en función al género.
References
Abu-Shanab, E. A. (2015). Reengineering the open government concept: An empirical support for a proposed model. Government Information Quarterly, 32(4), 453-463.
Astrom, J., Karlsson, M., Linde, J., & Pirannejad, A. (2012). Understanding the rise of e-participation in non-democracies: Domestic and international factors. Government Information Quarterly, 29(2), 142-150.
Attard, J., Orlandi, F., Scerri, S., & Auer, S. (2015). A systematic review of open government data initiatives. Government Information Quarterly, 32(4), 399- 418.
Baccarini, D. (1999). The Logical Framework Method for Defining Project Success. Project Management Journal, 30(4), 25-32.
Barry, E., & Bannister, F. (2014). Barriers to open data release: A view from the top. Information Polity: The International Journal of Government & Democracy in the Information Age, 19(1), 129-152.
Bates, J. (2014). The strategic importance of information policy for the contemporary neoliberal state: The case of open government data in the United Kingdom. Government Information Quarterly, 31(3), 388-395.
Bertot, J. C., Gorham, U., Jaeger, P. T., Sarin, L. C., & Choi, H. (2014). Big data, open government and e-government: Issues, policies and recommendations. Information Polity, 19(1, 2), 5 -16.
BID. (2016). Reform / modernization of the state. Effective, efficient and open governments for the region. BID’s Website. Recuperado de http://www.iadb.org/en/sector/reform-modernizationof-the-state/overview,18347.html
Bonsón, E., Royo, S., & Ratkai, M. (2015). Citizens’ engagement on local governments’ Facebook sites. An empirical analysis: The impact of different media and content types in Western Europe. Government Information Quarterly, 32(1), 52-62.
CEPAL. (2016). Gobierno abierto. Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe. Recuperado de http://www.cepal.org/es/temas/gobierno-abierto
CLAD. (2016). Carta Iberoamericana de Gobierno Abierto (CIGA), aprobada por la XVII Conferencia Iberoamericana de Ministras y Ministros de Administración Pública y Reforma del Estado. Recuperado de http://www.clad.org/images/declaraciones/CIGA_ 2016.pdf
Conradie, P., & Choenni, S. (2014). On the barriers for local government releasing open data. Government Information Quarterly, 31, Supplement 1(0), S10-S17.
Cooke-Davies, T. (2002). The “real” success factors on projects. International Journal of Project Management, 20(3), 185 -190.
Criado, I., Ruvalcaba-Gómez, E. A., & Valenzuela-Mendoza, R. (2018). Revisiting the Open Government Phenomenon. A Meta-Analysis of the International Literature. eJournal of eDemocracy & Open Government , 10 (1).
Criado, I., Sandoval-Almazán, R., & Gil-García, J. R. (2013) Government Innovation in Government using Social Media. Government Information Quartely. Social Science Citation Index), 30(4), 319-326.
Criado, J. I., & Ruvalcaba-Gomez, E. A. (2018). Perceptions of City Managers About Open Government Policies: Concepts, Development, and Implementation in the Local Level of Government in Spain. International Journal of Electronic Government Research (IJEGR), 14(1), 1-22.
Cruz-Rubio, C. N. (2015). ¿Qué es (y que no es) gobierno abierto? Una discusión con-ceptual. EUNOMÍA. Revista en Cultura de la Legalidad, 37-53.
Diez-Silva, H. M., Pérez-Ezcurdia, M. A., Gimena Ramos, F. N., & Montes-Guerra, M. I. (2012). Medición del desempeño y éxito en la dirección de proyectos. Perspectiva del Manager público. Revista EAN, (73), 60-79.
European Commission. (2016). Open government. Recuperado de https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/open-government
Gamba, S. (2008). ¿Qué es la perspectiva de género y los estudios de género? En Diccionario de estudios de Género y Feminismos”. Argentina: Editorial Biblos.
Ganapati, S., & Reddick, C. G. (2012). Open e-government in US state governments: Survey evidence from chief information officers. Government Information Quarterly, 29(2), 115 -122.
Gartzia, L., Aritzeta, A., Balluerka, N., & Heredia, E. B. (2012). Inteligencia emocional y género: más allá de las diferencias sexuales. Anales de Psicología/Annals of Psychology,28(2), 567-575.
Gascó, M. (2014). Open government. Opportunities and challenges for public governance. New York: Springer.
Grimmelikhuijsen, S. G. (2012). Transparency and trust. an experimental study of online disclosure and trust in government (Doctoral thesis). Utrecht University, Netherlands.
Gulati, G. J., Williams, C. B., & Yates, D. J. (2014). Predictors of on-line services and e-participation: A cross-national comparison. 31(4), 526-533.
Hood, Christopher (2011). From FOI world to WikiLeaks world: A new chapter in the transparency story? Governance.
Jaeger, Paul T. & Bertot, John Carlo (2010). Transparency and technological change: Ensuring equal and sustained public access to government information. Government Information Quarterly.
Janssen, M., & van den Hoven, J. (2015). Big and open linked data (BOLD) in government: A challenge to transparency and privacy? Government Information Quarterly,32(4), 363-368.
Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., & Zuiderwijk, A. (2012). Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Information Systems Management, 29(4), 258-268.
Jho, W., & Song, K. J. (2015). Institutional and technological determinants of civil e-participation: Solo or duet? Government Information Quarterly, 32(4), 488-495.
Kassen, M. (2013). A promising phenomenon of open data: A case study of the Chicago open data project. Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), 508-513.
Khayyat, M., & Bannister, F. (2015). Open data licensing: More than meets the. Information Polity: The International Journal of Government & Democracy in the Information Age, 20(4), 231-252.
Lathrop, D., & Ruma, L. (2010). Open government: Collaboration, transparency, and participation in practice “O’Reilly Media, Inc.”.
Lee, G., & Kwak, Y. H. (2012). An open government maturity model for social media-based public engagement. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 492-503.
Linders, D. (2013). Towards open development: Leveraging open data to improve the planning and coordination of international aid. Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), 426-434.
Luna-Reyes, L. F., Bertot, J. C., & Mellouli, S. (2014). Open government, open data and digital government. Government Information Quarterly, 31(1), 4-5.
Medaglia, R. (2012). eParticipation research: Moving characterization forward (2006–2011). Government Information Quarterly, 29(3), 346-360.
Meijer, A. J., Curtin, D., & Hillebrandt, M. (2012). Open government: Connecting vision and voice. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78(1), 10-29
Mellouli, S., Luna-Reyes, L., & Zhang, J. (2014). Smart government, citizen participation and open data. Information Polity: The International Journal of Government & Democracy in the Information Age, 19(1), 1-4.
Murray-Rust, P. (2008). Open data in science. Serials Review, 34(1), 52–64.
Noveck, B. S. (2015). Smart citizens, smarter state: The technologies of expertise and the future of governing. Harvard University Press.
OCDE. (2016). Open Government, OCDE’s Website. Recuperado de http://www.oecd.org/gov/open-government.htm
OEA. (2016). Gobierno Abierto. Website, sección del Departamento para la Gestión Pública Efectiva, Secretaría para el Fortalecimiento de la Democracia (SFD). Recuperado de http://www.oas.org/es/sap/dgpe/ACCESO/G_abierto.asp
OGP. (2011). Open Government Declaration. Recuperado de http://www.opengo-vpartnership.org/about/open-government-declaration
Oszlak, O. & Kaufman, E. (2014) Teoría y práctica del gobierno abierto. Red Gealc, OEA, IDRC.
Petrusic, D., Segedinac, M., & Konjovic, Z. (2016). Semantic modelling and ontology integration of the open government systems. Tehnicki vjesnik, 23(6), 1631-1641.Prabhakar, G. P. (2008). What is Project Success: A Literature Review. International Journal of Business and Management, 3(9), 3-9.
Red Gealc. 2016. La Red Gealc y el Gobierno abierto. Recuperado de http://redgealc.org/gobierno-abierto/contenido/5595/es/
Rivers, S. E., Brackett, M. A., Reyes, M. R., Mayer, J. D., Caruso, D. R., & Salovey, P. (2012). Measuring emotional intelligence in early adolescence with the MSCEIT-YV: Psychometric properties and relationship with academic performance and psycho-social functioning. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 30(4), 344-366.
Sandoval-Almazán, Rodrigo (2011), “The two door perspective: An assessment framework for open government”, eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government, 3(2): 166-181.Sayogo, D. S., & Pardo, T. A. (2013). Exploring the determinants of scientific data sharing: Understanding the motivation to publish research data. Government Information Quarterly, 30, Supplement 1(0), S19-S31.
Scholl, H. J., Kubicek, H., Cimander, R., & Klischewski, R. (2012). Process integration, information sharing, and system interoperation in government: A comparative case analysis. Government Information Quarterly, 29(3), 313-323.
Scott, J. W. (2016). Género: ¿Todavía una categoría útil para el análisis? La manzana de la discordia, 6(1), 95-101.
Susha, I., & Grönlund, Å. (2012). eParticipation research: Systematizing the field. Government Information Quarterly, 29(3), 373-382.
Thompson, N., Ravindran, R., & Nicosia, S. (2015). Government data does not mean data governance: Lessons learned from a public sector application audit. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 316-322.
Whitmore, A. (2014). Using open government data to predict war: A case study of data and systems challenges. Government Information Quarterly, 31(4), 622-630.
Wijnhoven, F., Ehrenhard, M., & Kuhn, J. (2015). Open government objectives and participation motivations. Government Information Quarterly, 32(1), 30-42.
Williamson, V., & Eisen N. (2016). The impact of open government: Assessing the evidence. The Brookings Institution.
Wirtz, B. W., Piehler, R., Thomas, M. J., & Daiser, P. (2015). Resistance of Public Personnel to Open Government: A cognitive theory view of implementation barriers towards open government data. Public Management Review, 1-30.
Wooldridge, J. M. (2015). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach. Nelson Education.
Yang, T., Pardo, T., & Wu, Y. (2014). How is information shared across the boundaries of government agencies? an e-government case study. Government Information Quarterly, 31(4), 637-652.
Yu, H., & Robinson, D. G. (2012). The new ambiguity of open government. UCLA Law Review Discourse, 59, 178-208.
Zuiderwijk, A., & Janssen, M. (2014). Open data policies, their implementation and impact: A framework for comparison. Government Information Quarterly, 31(1), 17-29. Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M., & Davis, C. (2014). Innovation with open data: Essential elements of open data ecosystems. Information Polity: The International Journal of Government & Democracy in the Information Age, 19(1), 17- 33.