The role of reception and production modalities in discourse comprehension: a study on early interactions in primary school children

The role of reception and production modalities in discourse comprehension: a study on early interactions in primary school children

Main Article Content

Pilar Vieiro Iglesias

Abstract

The aim of this work is to study the role of reception modalities (listening / reading) and production (speaking / writing) of language in child´s 3rd grade, 49 girls and 49 boys (average age: 8.2 years). We used two types of measurement: microproposicional analysis of text and story grammar analysis. In micropropositional analysis, results showed significant differences and interactions such between conditions, both reception (listening and reading) as in production (speaking and writing). Oral communication (listening and speaking) facilitated the identification of the main ideas while is written communication (reading and writing) facilitated memory strategies. Analysis from the grammar of stories showed no significant differences between modalities and interactions between them: the structural organization and the type of propositions recalled were very similar in the four conditions.

References

Arias-Gundín, O., and Fidalgo, R. (2017). El perfil escritor como variable moduladora de los

procesos involucrados en la composición escrita en estudiantes universitarios. European

Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 7(1), 59-68.

doi:10.1989/ejihpe.v7i1.195

Bedford, C., Geiger, S., Moyse, S., and Turner, M. (1995). Use of listening comprehension in the

identification and assessment of specific learning disabilities. Educational Psychology in

Practice, 10(4), 207-214.

Bekerian, D.A., and Dennett, J.L. (1990). Spoken and written recall of visual narratives. Applied

Cognitive Psychology, 4(3), 175-187.

Berninger, V., Abbott, R., Jones, J., Wolf, B., Gould, L., Anderson-Youngstrom, M., Shimade, S.,

and Apel, K (2010). Early development of language by hand: composing, reading,

listening and speaking connectios; three letter-writing modes; and fast mapping in

spelling. Developmental Neuropsychology, 9(1), 61-92.

DOI:10.1207/s15326942dn2901_5

Bibar, D., Conrad, S., Reppen, R., Byrd, P., and Het, M. (2002). Speaking and writing in the

University: a multidimensional Comparasion. Tesol Quartely, 36 (1), 9-48

Bloome, D. (2006). What counts as evidence in researching spoken and written discourses?.

Research in the Teaching of English, 41(2), 143-147.

Carlisle, J.F., and Felbinger, L. (1991). Profiles of listening and reading comprehension. Journal

of Educational Research, 84(6), 345-354. DOI:10.1080/02702710590910584

Dannes, F. (1993). Involvement with language and in language. Journal of Pragmatics, 22(3-4),

-278.

Flavell, J.H. (1976). The development of communication. Paris: Paper presented at First

International Congress of Psychology.

Fleischman, S. (1991). Discourse as space/Discourse as time: Reflections on the metalanguage of

spoken and written discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 16(4), 291-306.

Frankel, R.M. (1989). I wz wondering -- uhm could Raid uhm effect the brain permanentlyly d'

know?: Some observations on the intersection of speaking and writing in calls to a

poison control center. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 53(2), 195-226.

Gillam, R.B., and Johnston, J.R. (1992). Spoken and written language relationships in language.

Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35(6), 1303-1315.

Hawkins, R,, Musti-Rao, S., Hale, A., McGuine, S., and Hailley, J. (2010). Examining Listening

Previewing as a Classwide Strategy to Promote Reading Comprehension and

Vocabulary. Psychology in Schools, 47(9), 903-916.

Hron, A., Kurbjuhn, I., Mandl, H., and Schnotz, W. (1991). Structural inferences in reading and

listening. In G. Rickheit, and H. Strohner (Eds.), Inferences in text processing (pp. 1-10).

Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publisher.

Kim, Y., Park, Ch., and Wagner, R. (2014). Is Oral/Text Reading Fluency a "Bridge" to Reading

Comprehension? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 27(1), 79-99.

Kintsch, W., and van Dijk, T. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension. Psychological

Review, 85, 363-393.

Kök, L. (2018). Relationship between Listening Comprehension Strategy Use and Listening

Comprehension Proficiency. International Journal of Listening, 173-179

Lepola, J., Lynch, J., Kiuru, N., Laakkonen, E., and Niemi, P. (2016). Early oral language

comprehension, task orientation, and foundational reading skills as predictors of grade 3

reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 51(4), 373-390.

Lervåg, A., Hulme, Ch., and Melby-Lervåg, M. (2018). Unpicking the Developmental

Relationship between Oral Language Skills and Reading Comprehension: It's Simple,

but Complex. Child Development, 89(5), 1821-1838.

Lowe, D., and Brock, J. (1994). Characteristics of effective graduate psychology courses: student

and faculty perspectives. Teaching Psychology, 21(2), 82-85.

Luczynski, J. (1991). Functional composition strategies in text written by Polish- and Englishspeaking children. Journal of Social Psychology, 131(2), 285-287.

Mason, L., and Bascolo, P. (2000). Writing and conceptual change: What changes?. Instructional

Science, 28, 199-226. DOI:10.1023/A:1003854216687

McCutchen, D., Covill, A., Hoyne, S.H., and Mildes, K. (1994). Individual differences in writing:

Implications of translating fluency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(2), 256-266.

Moorman, G B., Blanton, W.E., and McLaughlin, T.M. (1992). The rhetoric of whole language.

Reading Psychology, 13(2), 3-15.

Nicholson, T., and Whyte, B. (1992). Matthew effects in learning new words while listening to

stories. National Reading Conference Yearbook, 41, 499-503.

Olson, D.R. (1977). From utterance to text: the bias of language in speech and writing. Harvard

Educational Review, 47, 257-281.

Owolewa, O.O., and Oyewole, O. (2017). Effects of listening strategies’instruction on

students’attitude to listening. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology

and Education, 3(2) 113-123.

Rasinski, T.V. (1990). Effects of repeated reading and listening-while-reading on reading fluency.

The Journal of Educational Research, 83(3), 147-151.

Rijlaarsdam, G., van-den-Bergh, H., and Zwarts, M. (1992). Incidentele transfer bij produktieve

taalopdrachten: een aanzet tot een baseline. Tijdschrift-voor-Oderwijsresearch, 17(1),

-66.

Robbins, C., and Ehri, L.C. (1994). Reading story to kindergartens helps them learn new

vocabulary words. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(1), 54-64.

Rousseau, M.K., Tam, B.K.Y., and Ramnarain, R. (1993). Increasing reading profiency of

language-minority students with speech and language impairments. Education and

Treatment of Children, 16(3), 254-271.

Rubin, A. (1980). A theoretical taxonomy of the differences between oral and written language. In

R. Spiro, B. Bruce, and W. Brewer (Eds), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension.

Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.

Silva, M., and Cain, K. (2015). The relations between lower and higher level comprehension skills

and their role in prediction of early reading comprehension. Journal of Educational

Psychology, 107(2), 321.

Sindoni, M.G. (2014). Spoken and written discourse in online interactions: A multimodal

approach. Routledge.

Smyth, M.M., and Scholey, K.A. (1994). Interference in immediate spatial memory. Memory and

Cognition, 22(1), 1-13.

Sorrell, J.M. (1991). Effects of writing/speaking on comprehension of information for informed

consent. Western Journal of Nusering Research, 13(1), 110-122.

Stothard, S.E., and Hulme, Ch. (1992). Reading comprehension difficulties in children: the role of

language comprehension and working memory skills. Reading and Writing, 4(3),

-256.

Stout, C.J. (1992). Critical thinking and micro-writing in art appreciation. Visual Arts Research,

(1), 57-71.

Thompson, I., and Rubin, J. (1996). Can strategy instruction improve listening comprehension?.

Foreign Language Annals, 29(3), 33-77.

Thorndyke, P.W. (1977). Cognitive structures in comprehension and memory of narrative

discourse. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 77-110.

Turner, A., and Greene, E. (1977). The construction of a propositional text base. JSAS Catalog of

Selected Documents in Psychology, 3, 98.

Vandergrift, L. (2002). It was nice to see that our predictions were right: Developing

metacognition in L” listening comprehension. The Canadian Modern Language Review,

, 55-575.

Vauras, M., Kinnunen, R., and Kuusela, L. (1994). Development of text-processing skills in high-,

average-, and low-achieving primary school children. Journal of Reading Behavior,

(2), 361-389.

Vidal, K. (2011). A Comparison of the Effects of Reading and Listening on Incidental Vocabulary

Acquisition. Language Learning, 61(1), 219-258.

Vieiro, P., and García-Madruga, J.A. (1997). An analysis of story comprehension through spoken

and written summaries in school-age children. Reading and Writing, 9, 41-53.

DOI:10.1023/a:1007932429184

Willimas, C., Stathis, R., and Gotsch, P. (2008). Speaking of writing: the significant of oral

language in English learners´literacy development. Ruidoso, NM: Teacher Writing

Center.

Wolf, M., Muijselaar, M., Boonstra. M., and de Bree, E. (2019). The relationship between reading

and listening comprehension: shared and modality-specific components. Reading and

Writing, 32, 1747–1767.