¿Escapar del Estado regulatorio?
Barra lateral del artículo
Detalles del artículo
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
La publicación se distribuye bajo la licencia Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Los derechos de los trabajos publicados en esta revista son propiedad del autor y son libres de distribuir y difundir las mismas fuentes siempre que cite correctamente la fuente de publicación y estos actos no tengan fines comerciales.
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
El Estado regulatorio es inescapable en democracias y repúblicas liberales alrededor del mundo. Con similar ubicuidad es criticado en diversos sentidos: por crecer sin límites, no cumplir sus objetivos y beneficiar a ciertos grupos en desmedro de otros. En este artículo, evaluamos medidas para reducir sus costos sociales.
Citas
Ashford, Nicholas (1981): “Alternatives to cost-benefit analysis in regulatory decisions”, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 363, Nº 1: pp. 129-137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1981.tb20726.x.
Backhaus, Jürgen et al (2012): The law and economics of class actions in Europe: Lessons from America. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
Bradford, Anu (2019): Brussels Effect: How the European Union rules the world. Oxford University Press.
Breyer, Stephen (1993): Breaking the vicious circle: Toward effective risk regulation. Harvard University Press.
Calabresi, Guido (1982): A Common law for the age of statutes. Harvard University Press.
Carrigan, Christopher & Shapiro, Stuart (2016): “What’s wrong with the back of the envelope? A call for simple (and timely) benefit-cost analysis”, Regulation & Governance, vol. 11, Nº 2: pp. 203-212. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12120.
Coffee, John (1986): “Understanding the plaintiff’s attorney: the implications of economic theory for private enforcement of law through class and derivative actions”, Columbia Law Review, vol. 86: pp. 669-727. https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship/26.
Daines, Robert (2001): “Does Delaware law improve firm value?”, Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 62, Nº 3: pp. 525-558. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(01)00086-1.
Dudley, Susan (2021): “Milestones in the evolution of the administrative state”, Daedalus, vol. 150, Nº 3: pp. 33-48. https://doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_01858.
Dunt, Ian (2021): How to be a liberal: The story of liberalism and the fight for its life. Canbury Press Ltd. Driesen, David (2005): “Is cost-benefit analysis neutral?”, University of Colorado Law Review, vol. 77. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.663602.
Esteve, José (2015): “La Administración garante: una aproximación”, Revista de Administración Pública, vol. 197: pp. 11-40. https://doi.org/10.18042/cepc/rap.197.01.
Lawson, Gary (1994): “The rise and rise of the Administrative State”, Harvard Law Review, vol. 107, Nº6: pp. 1231-1254. https://scholarship.law.bu.edu/faculty_scholarship/948/.
Luca, Davide et al (2023): “Progressive Cities: Urban-Rural polarisation of social values and economic development around the world”, International Inequalities Institute. [Archivo PDF]. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980221148388.
Majone, Giandomenico (1992): Evidence, argument and persuasion in the policy process. Yale University Press.
Maranto, Robert & Woessner, Matthew (2012): “Diversifying the Academy: How conservative academics can thrive in liberal academia”, Political Science & Politics, vol. 45, Nº 3: pp. 469-474. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096512000352.
Moran, Michel (2002): “Review article: Understanding the Regulatory State”, British Journal of Political Science, vol. 32, Nº 2: pp. 391-413. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123402000169.
Morton, Scott et al (2021): Equitable interoperability: The ‘super tool’ of digital platform governance. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3923602.
Mclaughlin, Coffey et al (2016): “The cumulative cost of regulations”, Duke I&E Research Paper, Nº 2016-45. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2869145.
Norris, Pippa (2021): “Cancel culture: myth or reality?”, Political Studies, vol. 71, Nº 2. https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217211037023.
Olson, Mancur (1965): The logic of collective action. Harvard University Press.
Peltzman, Sam (1976): “Toward a more general theory of regulation”, The Journal of Law and Economics, vol. 19, Nº 2: pp. 211-248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/466865.
Quintana, Eduardo (2005): “Los reguladores de electricidad, saneamiento y telecomunicaciones en su espacio: ¿Captura o administración de recursos dispersos? Themis-Revista de Derecho, Nº 52: 93–120. https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/themis/article/view/8826.
Redacción RPP (2018): Más de la mitad de la población está a favor del alza del impuesto ISC, de acuerdo a datum. https://rpp.pe/economia/economia/mas-de-la-mitad-de-la-poblacion-esta-a-favor-delalza-del-impuesto-isc-de-acuerdo-a-datum-noticia-1122585.
Renfrew Colloquium (2022): Populism, progressive elites and the notion of ‘caviar left’ in Peru. Youtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pVFiy0mYoVk.
Rebaza, Alberto (1993): “El régimen económico en una Constitución: ¿Solución o fuente de conflictos?”, Ius et Veritas, Nº 7: pp. 55-60. https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/15393.
Rosemberg, David (2022): “The regulatory advantage of class action”, in: Viscusi, W.Kip (ed.), Regulation through litigation. Brookings Institution Press & American Enterprise Institute.
Simmons, Randy et al (2010): “Bootleggers, Baptists and political entrepreneurs: Key players in the rational and morality play of regulatory politics”, The Independent Review, vol. 15, Nº 3: pp: 367-381.
Sumar, Oscar & Iñiguez, Eduardo (2017): Economía y Constitución - Las libertades económicas en la jurisprudencia del Tribunal Constitucional. Editorial Jurídica Themis.
Sumar, Oscar & Méndez, Rubén (2022): “Tax the rich? Taxation as a way to discourage regulations”, Religación - Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, vol. 7, Nº 32. https://doi.org/10.46652/rgn.v7i32.882.
Moreno, Luis (2019): Teoría de la regulación - Hacia un derecho administrativo de la regulación. Universidad Externado de Colombia.
Food Insight (2019): Even on food issues - Politics divides Americans [Video]. https://foodinsight.org/Even-On-Food-Issues-Politics-Divides-Americans/.
Foster, Peter (2014): Why we bite the invisible hand: The psychology of anti-capitalism. Editorial Prensa Agradable.
Guerra-García, Gustavo & Jauregui, Greta (2008): Guía para la evaluación de proyectos de ley. Editorial Asociación Civil Transparencia.
Glaeser, Edward & Shleifer, Andrei (2003): “The rise of the regulatory State”, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 41, Nº 2: pp. 401-425. https://doi.org/10.1257/002205103765762725.
Kresalja, Baldo (2015): “¿Estado o mercado? El principio de subsidiaridad en la Constitución peruana”, Publishing House - Fondo Editorial de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. https://doi.org/10.18800/9786123171407.
Laguna, José (2011): “Regulación, externalización de actividades administrativas y autorregulación”, Revista de Administración Pública, Nº 185: pp. 89-112. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=3732677.
Sunstein, Cass (1990): “Paradoxes of the Regulatory State”, The University of Chicago Law Review, vol. 57, Nº 2: pp. 407-441. https://doi.org/10.2307/1599951.
Scott, Colin (2001): “Analysing regulatory space: Fragmented resources and institutional design”, Public Law: pp. 283-305.
Scott, Colin (2017): “The regulatory state and beyond”, in: Drahos, Peter (ed.), Regulatory theory: Foundations and applications. ANU Press.
Stigler, George (1971): The theory of economic regulation”, The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, vol. 2, Nº 1: pp. 3-21. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003160
Tullock, Gordon et al (2004): The calculus of consent: Logical foundations of constitutional democracy. Liberty Fund Inc.
Tushnet, Mark (2021): “Introduction: The pasts & futures of the Administrative State”, Daedalus, vol. 150, Nº 3: pp. 5-16. https://direct.mit.edu/daed/article/150/3/5/102571/Introduction-The-Pastsamp-Futures-of-the
The George Washington University (2018): A brief history of regulation and deregulation: Regulatory Studies Center: Trachtenberg School of Public Policy & Public Administration. https://regulatorystudies.columbian.gwu.edu/brief-history-regulation-and-deregulation.
Walker, Cristopher (2022): “A Congressional Review Act for the Major Questions Doctrine”, Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, vol. 45, Nº 3: pp. 773-793. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4230476.
Viscusi, W.Kip et al (2005): Economics of regulation and antitrust. MIT Press.
Vogel, David (1995): Trading up: Consumer and environmental regulation in a global economy. Harvard University Press.
Vermeule, Adrian (2013): The Constitution of risk. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107338906.
Regulations
Circular N° 0024-2022-BCRP (06/10/2022). Aprueban el Reglamento de Interoperabilidad de los servicios de pago provistos por los proveedores, acuerdos y sistemas de pagos. https://www.bcrp.gob.pe/docs/Transparencia/Normas-Legales/Circulares/2022/circular 0024-2022-bcrp.pdf.
Case law
Tribunal Constitucional: 24 de marzo 2004. Exp. N° 0858-2003-AA