Scaping the Regulatory State?
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
La publicación se distribuye bajo la licencia Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Los derechos de los trabajos publicados en esta revista son propiedad del autor y son libres de distribuir y difundir las mismas fuentes siempre que cite correctamente la fuente de publicación y estos actos no tengan fines comerciales.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Resumo
The regulatory state is inescapable in liberal democracies and republics around the world. With similar ubiquity, it is criticized in various ways: for growing without limits, not meeting its objectives and benefiting certain groups to the detriment of society. In this article, we considered measures to reduce its social costs.
Referências
Ashford, Nicholas (1981): “Alternatives to cost-benefit analysis in regulatory decisions”, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 363, Nº 1: pp. 129-137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1981.tb20726.x.
Backhaus, Jürgen et al (2012): The law and economics of class actions in Europe: Lessons from America. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
Bradford, Anu (2019): Brussels Effect: How the European Union rules the world. Oxford University Press.
Breyer, Stephen (1993): Breaking the vicious circle: Toward effective risk regulation. Harvard University Press.
Calabresi, Guido (1982): A Common law for the age of statutes. Harvard University Press.
Carrigan, Christopher & Shapiro, Stuart (2016): “What’s wrong with the back of the envelope? A call for simple (and timely) benefit-cost analysis”, Regulation & Governance, vol. 11, Nº 2: pp. 203-212. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12120.
Coffee, John (1986): “Understanding the plaintiff’s attorney: the implications of economic theory for private enforcement of law through class and derivative actions”, Columbia Law Review, vol. 86: pp. 669-727. https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship/26.
Daines, Robert (2001): “Does Delaware law improve firm value?”, Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 62, Nº 3: pp. 525-558. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(01)00086-1.
Dudley, Susan (2021): “Milestones in the evolution of the administrative state”, Daedalus, vol. 150, Nº 3: pp. 33-48. https://doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_01858.
Dunt, Ian (2021): How to be a liberal: The story of liberalism and the fight for its life. Canbury Press Ltd. Driesen, David (2005): “Is cost-benefit analysis neutral?”, University of Colorado Law Review, vol. 77. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.663602.
Esteve, José (2015): “La Administración garante: una aproximación”, Revista de Administración Pública, vol. 197: pp. 11-40. https://doi.org/10.18042/cepc/rap.197.01.
Lawson, Gary (1994): “The rise and rise of the Administrative State”, Harvard Law Review, vol. 107, Nº6: pp. 1231-1254. https://scholarship.law.bu.edu/faculty_scholarship/948/.
Luca, Davide et al (2023): “Progressive Cities: Urban-Rural polarisation of social values and economic development around the world”, International Inequalities Institute. [Archivo PDF]. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980221148388.
Majone, Giandomenico (1992): Evidence, argument and persuasion in the policy process. Yale University Press.
Maranto, Robert & Woessner, Matthew (2012): “Diversifying the Academy: How conservative academics can thrive in liberal academia”, Political Science & Politics, vol. 45, Nº 3: pp. 469-474. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096512000352.
Moran, Michel (2002): “Review article: Understanding the Regulatory State”, British Journal of Political Science, vol. 32, Nº 2: pp. 391-413. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123402000169.
Morton, Scott et al (2021): Equitable interoperability: The ‘super tool’ of digital platform governance. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3923602.
Mclaughlin, Coffey et al (2016): “The cumulative cost of regulations”, Duke I&E Research Paper, Nº 2016-45. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2869145.
Norris, Pippa (2021): “Cancel culture: myth or reality?”, Political Studies, vol. 71, Nº 2. https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217211037023.
Olson, Mancur (1965): The logic of collective action. Harvard University Press.
Peltzman, Sam (1976): “Toward a more general theory of regulation”, The Journal of Law and Economics, vol. 19, Nº 2: pp. 211-248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/466865.
Quintana, Eduardo (2005): “Los reguladores de electricidad, saneamiento y telecomunicaciones en su espacio: ¿Captura o administración de recursos dispersos? Themis-Revista de Derecho, Nº 52: 93–120. https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/themis/article/view/8826.
Redacción RPP (2018): Más de la mitad de la población está a favor del alza del impuesto ISC, de acuerdo a datum. https://rpp.pe/economia/economia/mas-de-la-mitad-de-la-poblacion-esta-a-favor-delalza-del-impuesto-isc-de-acuerdo-a-datum-noticia-1122585.
Renfrew Colloquium (2022): Populism, progressive elites and the notion of ‘caviar left’ in Peru. Youtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pVFiy0mYoVk.
Rebaza, Alberto (1993): “El régimen económico en una Constitución: ¿Solución o fuente de conflictos?”, Ius et Veritas, Nº 7: pp. 55-60. https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/15393.
Rosemberg, David (2022): “The regulatory advantage of class action”, in: Viscusi, W.Kip (ed.), Regulation through litigation. Brookings Institution Press & American Enterprise Institute.
Simmons, Randy et al (2010): “Bootleggers, Baptists and political entrepreneurs: Key players in the rational and morality play of regulatory politics”, The Independent Review, vol. 15, Nº 3: pp: 367-381.
Sumar, Oscar & Iñiguez, Eduardo (2017): Economía y Constitución - Las libertades económicas en la jurisprudencia del Tribunal Constitucional. Editorial Jurídica Themis.
Sumar, Oscar & Méndez, Rubén (2022): “Tax the rich? Taxation as a way to discourage regulations”, Religación - Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, vol. 7, Nº 32. https://doi.org/10.46652/rgn.v7i32.882.
Moreno, Luis (2019): Teoría de la regulación - Hacia un derecho administrativo de la regulación. Universidad Externado de Colombia.
Food Insight (2019): Even on food issues - Politics divides Americans [Video]. https://foodinsight.org/Even-On-Food-Issues-Politics-Divides-Americans/.
Foster, Peter (2014): Why we bite the invisible hand: The psychology of anti-capitalism. Editorial Prensa Agradable.
Guerra-García, Gustavo & Jauregui, Greta (2008): Guía para la evaluación de proyectos de ley. Editorial Asociación Civil Transparencia.
Glaeser, Edward & Shleifer, Andrei (2003): “The rise of the regulatory State”, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 41, Nº 2: pp. 401-425. https://doi.org/10.1257/002205103765762725.
Kresalja, Baldo (2015): “¿Estado o mercado? El principio de subsidiaridad en la Constitución peruana”, Publishing House - Fondo Editorial de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. https://doi.org/10.18800/9786123171407.
Laguna, José (2011): “Regulación, externalización de actividades administrativas y autorregulación”, Revista de Administración Pública, Nº 185: pp. 89-112. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=3732677.
Sunstein, Cass (1990): “Paradoxes of the Regulatory State”, The University of Chicago Law Review, vol. 57, Nº 2: pp. 407-441. https://doi.org/10.2307/1599951.
Scott, Colin (2001): “Analysing regulatory space: Fragmented resources and institutional design”, Public Law: pp. 283-305.
Scott, Colin (2017): “The regulatory state and beyond”, in: Drahos, Peter (ed.), Regulatory theory: Foundations and applications. ANU Press.
Stigler, George (1971): The theory of economic regulation”, The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, vol. 2, Nº 1: pp. 3-21. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003160
Tullock, Gordon et al (2004): The calculus of consent: Logical foundations of constitutional democracy. Liberty Fund Inc.
Tushnet, Mark (2021): “Introduction: The pasts & futures of the Administrative State”, Daedalus, vol. 150, Nº 3: pp. 5-16. https://direct.mit.edu/daed/article/150/3/5/102571/Introduction-The-Pastsamp-Futures-of-the
The George Washington University (2018): A brief history of regulation and deregulation: Regulatory Studies Center: Trachtenberg School of Public Policy & Public Administration. https://regulatorystudies.columbian.gwu.edu/brief-history-regulation-and-deregulation.
Walker, Cristopher (2022): “A Congressional Review Act for the Major Questions Doctrine”, Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, vol. 45, Nº 3: pp. 773-793. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4230476.
Viscusi, W.Kip et al (2005): Economics of regulation and antitrust. MIT Press.
Vogel, David (1995): Trading up: Consumer and environmental regulation in a global economy. Harvard University Press.
Vermeule, Adrian (2013): The Constitution of risk. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107338906.
Regulations
Circular N° 0024-2022-BCRP (06/10/2022). Aprueban el Reglamento de Interoperabilidad de los servicios de pago provistos por los proveedores, acuerdos y sistemas de pagos. https://www.bcrp.gob.pe/docs/Transparencia/Normas-Legales/Circulares/2022/circular 0024-2022-bcrp.pdf.
Case law
Tribunal Constitucional: 24 de marzo 2004. Exp. N° 0858-2003-AA