Micro-Institutional Performance Analysis: Thoughts on the use of technology. The Case of the Colombian (criminal) justice system
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
La publicación se distribuye bajo la licencia Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Los derechos de los trabajos publicados en esta revista son propiedad del autor y son libres de distribuir y difundir las mismas fuentes siempre que cite correctamente la fuente de publicación y estos actos no tengan fines comerciales.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Resumo
The need for the technological continuous improvement of the administration of justice was particularly evident for Colombia, a country used as an example due to its social dynamics and institutional adjustments. Hence, this article focuses on examining and arguing this scenario using a heterodox legal-economic approach.
Referências
Legislation and regulations
Decree 806 of 2020. https://bit.ly/4a9lCRK
Law 270 of 1996. https://bit.ly/3UORpCR
Law 527 of 1999. https://bit.ly/3QADZbo
Law 734 of 2002. http://www.secretariasenado.gov.co/senado/basedoc/ley_0734_2002.html
Law 906 of 2004. http://www.secretariasenado.gov.co/senado/basedoc/ley_0906_2004.html
Law 1285 of 2009. http://www.secretariasenado.gov.co/senado/basedoc/ley_1285_2009.html
Law 1395 of 2010. http://www.secretariasenado.gov.co/senado/basedoc/ley_1395_2010.html
Law 1564 of 2012 (General Procedural Code). http://www.secretariasenado.gov.co/senado/basedoc/ley_1564_2012.html
Law 2213 of 2022. https://www.funcionpublica.gov.co/eva/gestornormativo/norma.php?i=187626
Statutory Bill 295 of 2020. https://bit.ly/44NVzi1
Statutory Bill 475 of 2021. https://bit.ly/4b7oSye
Ruling C-134 of 2023. https://bit.ly/3Ww01PZ
Doctrinal references
Alonso, José Antonio, & Garcimartin, Carlos (2008): Collective Action and Development.The Role of Institutions. Editorial Complutense.
Arrow, Kenneth J. (1986): “Rationality of Self and Others in an Economic System”. The Journal of Business, 59(4), S385-S399. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2352770
Bernal Pulido, Carlos (2005): El Derecho de los derechos. Universidad Externado de Colombia.
Boettke, Peter J. (2012): Living Economics, Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow. The Independent Institute.
Calabresi, Guido (1970): The Cost of Accidents: A Legal and Economic Analysis. Yale University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1cc2mmw
Castaño, Daniel (2022): Justice as a digital service. Editorial Instituto de Ciencia Política Hernán Echavarría Olózaga. https://bit.ly/4bjnRTsCruz
Castellanos Díaz, Juliana, Méndez Reátegui, Rubén, & Paladines, María. Camila (2023): “Study on the regulatory process of ultra-processed food labeling: Colombian case”. Revista Justicia & Derecho, 6(1), 1-9. https://revistas.uautonoma.cl/index.php/rjyd/article/view/2033
Colombian Institute of Procedural Law (2022): Memories of the Seminar on the Update of Law 2213 of 2022.
Cruz Tejada, H. (2022): Breves comentarios a la ley 2213 de 2022. https://www.abogadosbaluarte.com/noticias/breves-comentarios-la-ley-2213-de-2022
Ghersi Silva, Enrique (2020): Derecho & Economía: Estudios Críticos. Centro de Publicaciones de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador - Instituto Ecuatoriano de Análisis Económico del Derecho.
Holtskog, Halvo (2013): Continuous Improvement Beyond the Lean Understanding, Procedia CIRP, 7.
Klammer, Sarah S., & Scorsone Eric A. (2022): The legal foundations of micro-institutional performance: a heterodox law & economics approach. Edward Elgar.
Méndez Reátegui, Rubén (2014): “Structured, Transitional and Unstructured Civil Societies: An Institutional Approach”. Revista Procesos de Mercado, 11(2), 299-327. https://doi.org/10.52195/pm.v11i2.172
Méndez Reátegui, Rubén (2017): Essays on institutions, coordination, and legal theory. Centro de Publicaciones de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador.
Méndez Reátegui, Sumar Albujar, Oscar (2020): “Gobierno conforme al Derecho versus Estado de Legalidad”.Revista deDerecho Político, 1(109), 373-400. https://doi.org/10.5944/rdp.109.2020.29065
MINCIT (2019): Strategic Planning 2019-2022. https://bit.ly/3Uv5AeX
Montes, Karina, & Moreno, Luis Ferney (2021): Regulatory Improvement. Regulatory impact analysis. Universidad Externado de Colombia.
Noveck, Beth Simone (2022): How to solve public problems. A practical guide to fixing the government and changing the world. Galaxia Gutenberg.
Palomo, Diego, and Ubilla, Benjamín (2023): Virtuality in Justice: critical points to review in postCOVID-19. https://bit.ly/3WxbkYn
Polanyi, Karl (1944-2007): The great transformation of sociology. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Sociales.
Sierra Fajardo, Oscar (n.d.). Presentiality in justice: To go back is to go backward. https://cesjul.org/presencialidad-en-la-justicia/
Tapias Saldaña, Ángela Cristina (2017): Application of restorative justice in alternative dispute resolution mechanisms and restorative justice. In Justicia Restaurativa. Applications from the academy. USTA.
Thaler, Richard H. (2016): Everything I’ve learned with economic psychology. Planeta.
Linkography
Excellence in Justice Corporation (2021): The challenges of justice in Colombia in the face of virtuality. https://bit.ly/4b7Mgvk
Legis - Ámbito Jurídico (2021): Presentiality or virtuality in justice, the debate is open. https://bit.ly/4doKbwV
Superior Council of the Judiciary (2020): Whereby measures are adopted for the lifting of judicial terms and other provisions are issued for reasons of public health and force majeure. https://bit.ly/4dy8vfy
Universidad de Los Andes (2022): Digital Justice Conversatory: Are we prepared? Critical and interdisciplinary visions to Decree 806 of 2020. https://uniandes.edu.co/es/noticias/derecho/lajusticia-virtual-despues-de-la-pandemia