Validation morphological oral awareness instrument
Main Article Content
Abstract
Morphological awareness can play an important role in the process of literacy refers. It presents an experimental validation study with a sample of students pre-readers in kindergarten and first students of Primary Education on Instrumento de Evaluación de la Conciencia Morfológica Oral (IECMO) designed for study Spanish and focuses on the evaluation of the three dimensions of morphological awareness: a) the morphology inflexional, b) derivacional morphology, and c) compound words. This study involved a total of fifty students belonging to the last year of kindergarten and first grade education. Their ages ranged from 5 to 7 years. In conjunction with experimental validation study presented the initial results of reliability testing for internal consistency, item analysis and stable test-retest analysis and the validity of the proof, or apparent conflict of content and construct or theoretical. The results obtained in the analysis of the psychometric properties of the instrument to verify verify both the validity of content and construct, as the reliability of IECMO. This tool can be very useful, since teachers should take into account the role of morphological awareness in learning and mastering different metalinguistic skills.
References
Mateo en un studio longitudinal sobre el desarrollo lector durante la educación primaria (1º
a 5º). European Journal of Education and Psychology 10, 23-32.
Arnbak, E., y Elbro, C. (2000). The effects of morphological awareness training on the reading and
spelling skills of young dyslexics. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 44(3),
229-251.
Carlisle, J.F. (1995). Morphological awareness and early ready achievement. En L.B. Feldman
(Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp.189-209). Hillsdale,
NJ: Erlbaum.
Carlisle, J.F. (2003). Morphology matters in learning to read: A commentary. Reading Psychology,
24, 291-322.
Cassalis, S., Colé, P., y Sopo, D. (2004). Morphological Awareness in Developmental Dyslexia.
Annals of Dislexia, 54(1), 114-138.
Cassalis, S., y Louis-Alexandre, M.F. (2000). Morphological analysis, phonological analysis and
learning to read French: a longitudinal study. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary
Journal, 12, 303-335.
Clin, E., Wade-Woolley, L., y Heggie, L. (2009). Prosodic sensitivity and morphological
awareness in children reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 104, 197-213.
Deacon, H., y Bryant, P. (2006). This turnip´s not for turning: Children´s use of root morphemes in
spelling. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 24, 567-575.
Duncan, L., Cassalis, S., y Colé, P. (2009). Early metalinguistic awareness of derivational
morphology: Observations from a comparison of English and French. Applied
Psycholinguistics, 30, 405-440.
García, J.N., y González, L. (2006). Diferencias en la conciencia morfológica, la escritura y el
lenguaje en función del desarrollo y el nivel educativo del niño. Psicothema, 18(2), 171-
179.
González, L., Rodríguez, C., Gázquez, J.J., González-Castro, P., y Álvarez, D. (2011). La
conciencia morfológica: tendencias de desarrollo y patrón evolutivo en Educación Infantil
y Primaria. Psicothema. 23(2), 239-244.
Green, L., McCutchen, D., Shwiebert, C., Quinlan, T., Eva-Wood, A., y Juelis, J. (2003).
Morphological Development in Children´s Writing. Journal of Educational Psychology,
95(4), 752-761.
Jiménez, J.E., y del Cristo, S. (2017). Análisis factorial confirmatorio del Indicadores de Progreso
de Aprendizaje en Matemáticas (IPAM) en escalas de primer curso de Primaria. European
Journal of Invesstigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 7(1), 31-45.
Mahony, D., Singson, M., y Mann, V. (2000). Reading ability and sensitivity to morphological
relations. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 191-218.
McBride-Chang, C., Cho, J., Liu, H., Wagner, R., Shu, H., Zhou, A., Cheuk, C., y Muse, A.
(2005). Changing models across cultures: associations of phonological awareness and
morphological structure awareness with vocabulary and word recognition in second
graders from Beijing, Hong Kong, Korea, and the United States. Journal of Experimental
Child Psychology, 92, 140-160.
Moats, L. (2000). Speech to print: Language essentials for teachers. Baltimore: Brookes.
Morais, J. (1991). Constraints on the development of phonemic awareness. En S. Brady y D.
Shankweiler (Eds.), Phonological processes in literacy. A tribute to Isabelle Liberman
(pp. 5-27). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Nunes, T., Bryant, P., y Olson, J.M. (2003): Learning morphological and phonological spelling
rules: an intervention study. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 63,
141-170.
Nunes, T., y Bryant, P. (2004). Morphological awareness improves spelling and vocabulary.
Literacy Today, 11, 1-19.
Rodrigo, M., Jiménez, J.E., García, E., Díaz, A., Ortiz, M.R., Guzmán, R., Hernández-Valle, I.,
Estévez, A., y Hernández, S. (2004). Valoración del procesamiento ortográfico en niños
españoles con dislexia: El papel de las unidades léxicas y subléxicas. Revista Electrónica
de Investigación Psicoeducativa y Psicopedagógica, 2(2), 105-126.
Seymour, P.H.K. (1997). Foundations of orthographic development. En Perfetti, C. A.; Rieben, L.
y Fayol (Eds). Learning to spell: Research, theory, and practice across languages
(pp. 319-337). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.