Motivational profiles to coping stress strategies goals and management in university students

Motivational profiles to coping stress strategies goals and management in university students

Main Article Content

Victoria Franco Taboada
Ramón Gon´zalez Cabanach
Antonio Souto Gestal

Abstract

This research was designed to know the possible correlation among the motivational orientations of the students and the choices of the coping strategies they make before the different experiences of academic stress, and, additionally, to know if this could change based on the different orientation to goals. The participants were 468 university students with an average age of 21.82 years old (DT=3.13). A quick cluster analysis classified them into 5 groups with different orientations of approximation goals, and learning and performance avoidance. The coping factor that caused a greater degree of unanimity in the responses of all the orientation groups was Search for Social Support. This was not the case of the other two factors, Positive Reassessment and Resource Planning and Management, with a much more uneven presence among some groups and others, according to their motivational orientations, as there were significant differences between the avoidance and approximation groups in favour of the latter. It would be convenient to provide programmes to the students in order to learn to manage stress, to encourage the coping resources, to promote the motivational support and the positive affectivity, and to train abilities in order to know how to respond to the academic demands, and so, avoiding their vulnerability to the stress they generate

References

Bisquerra, R. (1989). Introducción conceptual al análisis multivariable. Un enfoque informático
con los paquetes estadísticos SPSS-X. LISREL y SPAD. Barcelona: Promociones
Publicaciones Universitarias.

Brougham, R., Zail, C., Mendoza, C., y Miller, J. (2009). Stress, sex differences, and coping
strategies among college students. Current Psychology, 28, 85-97. doi:10.1007/s12144-
009-9047-0

Cabanach, R.G., Fariña, F., Freire, C., González, P., y Ferradás, M. (2013). Diferencias en el
afrontamiento del estrés en estudiantes universitarios hombres y mujeres. European
Journal of Education and Psychology, 6(1), 19-32.

Cabanach, R.G., Valle, A., Rodríguez, S., Piñeiro, I., y Freire, C. (2010). Escala de afrontamiento
del estrés académico (A-CEA). Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología y Salud, 1(1), 51-
64.

Cabanach, R.G., Valle, A., Rodríguez, S., y Piñeiro, I. (2008). Afrontamiento del estrés en
contextos universitarios: Construcción de una escala de medida. Comunicación. V

Congreso Internacional de Psicología y Educación: los Retos de Futuro. Oviedo. 23-25
de abril.

Fernández, M.D., y Díaz, M.A. (2001). Relación entre estrategias de afrontamiento, síndromes
clínicos y trastornos de personalidad en pacientes esquizofrénicos crónicos. Revista de
Psicopatología y Psicología Clínica, 6, 129-136.

Fernández-Abascal, E.G. (1999). El estrés: Aspectos básicos y de intervención. En E.G.
Fernández-Abascal y F. Palmero (Eds), Emociones y salud (pp. 327-348). Barcelona:
Ariel, S.A.

González, M.T., y Landero, R. (2008). Síntomas psicosomáticos y estrés: Comparación de un
modelo estructural entre hombres y mujeres. Ciencia UANL, 11(4), 403-410.

IBM Corp (2013). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0. Armonk, NY: International
Business Machines Corporation.

Lazarus, R.S., y Folkman, S. (1986). Estrés y procesos cognitivos. Barcelona: Martínez Roca.

Richardson, C., y Poole, H. (2001). Chronic pain and coping: a proposed role for nurses and
nursing models. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 34, 659-667.

Skaalvik, E.M. (1997). Self- enhancing and self- defeating ego orientation: Relations with task and
avoidance orientation, achievement, self- perceptions, and anxiety. Journal of
Educational Psychology, 89, 71- 81.

Skinner, E.A., Edge, K., Altman, J., y Sherwood, H. (2003). Searching for the structure of coping:
A review and critique of category systems for classifying ways of coping. Psychological
Bulletin, 129, 216-269.